User avatar
By Watchman
#97542
I would just like to clarify; I have never made millions of the back of working class people, and Gary is not my cousin
User avatar
By Abernathy
#97683
Alex Phillips, former Brexit Party MEP, is on Newsnight. She is articulate, and I think quite bright, but it's as if she is contractually obliged to talk utter shite.

She is praising Trump unconditionally.

“If anybody else was saying that they thought that they deserved to get the Nobel Peace Prize, we’d all be saying “yer, good on you ! But because it’s Trump …”.

Trouble is, literally nobody else would ever make such a desperate, self-regarding pitch to be given a prestigious prize.
Last edited by Abernathy on Sat Oct 11, 2025 11:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
mattomac, Boiler liked this
By Oboogie
#97690
Abernathy wrote: Fri Oct 10, 2025 10:41 pm Trouble is, literally nobody else would ever make such a desperate, self-regarding pitch to be given a prestigious prize.
The Nobel committee literally said in response to a journalist at a press conference today that they've never had anyone canvass for the prize for themselves before.
User avatar
By Abernathy
#97692
Plus of course, the deadline for nominations (from someone else, not the putative prize recipient) for this particular iteration of the Nobel prizes was apparently January 2025 - when Trump had been president for only nine days. So he was always ineligible.

Mind you, he could in theory be eligible to win the prize in 2026 - IF the middle east peace process endures until then. Emily Thornberry says that if that is achieved, he should just be given the fucking prize, as he probably would deserve it then. Emily says if that happens, she’ll be wearing a MAGA hat.
By davidjay
#97697
I'm reminded of a few old National Treasures who either didn't get a knighthood or who were on their last legs when the sword was finally tapped on their shoulders - it was usually because they'd tried a bit too hard.
Last edited by davidjay on Sat Oct 11, 2025 10:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
By RedSparrows
#97705
The real trick is the control of the conversation. The media just follows it, every time: it becomes about Trump and this specific issue alone, and slots delightfully easily into the 'world Vs us' mindset his base loves.

Nobody seems to hold more than one piece of information together to consider things simultaneously. E.g. this very welcome cease fire in a context of: previous actions and statements over Gaza not being peaceful: using the military in US cities; claiming he ended 7 wars and miraculously ending one again; the public, venal demanding of the prize; bombing Venzeualan boats (even if drug related, it's bombing); presumably (admittedly I haven't double checked) continuing to supply arms to various murderous regimes worldwide; pardoning domestic insurrectionists; dismantling a democratic constitution; being a self evidently grotesque, venal, grubby moral vacuum.

Not all of those preclude a peace prize, perhaps, but some clearly should, and the rest are fundamentally significant.
Boiler, Abernathy liked this
By Bones McCoy
#97708
davidjay wrote: Sat Oct 11, 2025 2:24 am I'm reminded of a few old National Treasures who either didn't get a knighthood or who were on their last legs when the sword was finally tapped on their shoulders - it was usually because they'd tried a bit too hard.
Image
Tubby Isaacs liked this
By satnav
#97720
There seems to be quite a lot of nonsense being posted on social media by far right groups demanding that more British history should be taught in British schools. Schools are currently following a national curriculum which was drawn up and approved by Tory Education Secretary Michael Gove.

In the first 3 years in secondary school pupils follow a History curriculum which is dominated by British history but the emphasise is placed on giving pupils the skills to evaluate evidence and reach their own conclusions.

When it comes to GCSE where History is not compulsory a wider curriculum is offered because schools are keen for as many pupils as possible to opt for History. If GCSE History was dominated by British History less pupils would probably opt to study History. Typically schools cover thing like Medicine through History, the rise of the Nazi's, American history and the the Elizabethan period.

It is difficult to see which bits of British history those on the right think should be taught that isn't being taught.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#97722
It's not so much the what as the how. They want RJ Unstead, Our Island Story, and Quality Street tins. Even Gove wasn't mad enough to go fully down that rabbit hole.
By Bones McCoy
#97728
satnav wrote: Sat Oct 11, 2025 7:58 pm In the first 3 years in secondary school pupils follow a History curriculum which is dominated by British history but the emphasise is placed on giving pupils the skills to evaluate evidence and reach their own conclusions.
There's your problem.
By RedSparrows
#97729
Accidentally caught a moment on BBC just now: Think it was the Laura Kuennsberg programme. Nadine Dorries kissing Trump's ass with a great men of history read of the ceasefire in Gaza.

Why on earth is anyone paying her to opine on anything?!
  • 1
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
Conservatives Generally

There may or may not be a merger/ pact but what Je[…]

Those upon the political Right...

They don't even pretend to know what's i[…]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

I didn't really get that article, What's[…]

Nargle Fargle

One for Malcolm.